Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00771
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mims et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02802
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Eddie Mims and Jean Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barraza et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv01374
Plaintiff:
Maria E Barraza , Thomas Flournay , James Holt and others
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Dietz-Kinn v. ASPC - Perryville et al
as 2:2016cv00335
Plaintiff:
Maria Theresa Dietz-Kinn
Defendant:
ASPC - Perryville, Unknown McGrath, Unknown Riveria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Greer v. Goodyear, City of et al
as 2:2010cv01050
Plaintiff:
Loretta Ann Greer
Defendant:
Goodyear, City of, Phoenix, City of, United States, Government of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv01290
Plaintiff:
Karen Marie Hansen
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, Therese Schroeder, Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2009cv00139
Plaintiff:
Loretta Greer
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Harris, Frazior and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
