Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
as 24-734
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LAWRENCE LENK
Defendant:
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. Mel Foster Company
as 3:2023cv04455
Plaintiff:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Mel Foster Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Bel Power Solutions Inc
Defendant:
Monolithic Power Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kenneth Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
as 22-15887
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH L. LENK
Defendant / Appellee:
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
Kenneth Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
as 22-15568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH L. LENK
Defendant / Appellee:
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al v. Meraki Integrated Circuit(SHENZHEN) Technology, LTD.
as 4:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd.
Counter Claimant:
Meraki Intregrated Circuit (SHENZHEN) Technology, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Kenneth Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
as 21-17035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH L. LENK
Defendant / Appellee:
MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. et al v. Xiaomi USA LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01963
Plaintiff:
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., LTD and Chengdu Monolithic Power Systems Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Xiaomi USA LLC and Xiaomi Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 pt
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
