Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Monk #068675 v. McKamey et al
as 2:2014cv01710
Plaintiff:
Timothy Charles Monk
Defendant:
Arlene McKamey, Corizon Medical Services, Matt Mussen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Outten v. A Dillen et al
as 2:2013cv00230
Defendant:
B Anderson, B Anderson, C Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Outten
Mendoza, III v. City Of Fresno et al
as 1:2012cv00836
Plaintiff:
Benny Mendoza, III
Defendant:
City Of Fresno, William Dennis, Kristopher Keener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Masterson v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 11-15023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. MASTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, R. ROBINSON, Captain at Mule State Creek State Prison, sued in his official and individual capacity, V. RENDON, Lieutenant at Mule Creek State Prison, sued in his official and individual capacity and others
Daniel Masterson v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 10-15265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. MASTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, R. ROBINSON, Captain at Mule State Creek State Prison, sued in his official and individual capacity, V. RENDON, Lieutenant at Mule Creek State Prison, sued in his official and individual capacity and others
Daniel Masterson v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 10-15266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. MASTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, R. ROBINSON, Captain at Mule State Creek State Prison, sued in his official and individual capacity, V. RENDON, Lieutenant at Mule Creek State Prison, sued in his official and individual capacity and others
Daniel Masterson v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 10-15226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. MASTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, R. ROBINSON, Captain at Mule State Creek State Prison, sued in his official and individual capacity, V. RENDON, Lieutenant at Mule Creek State Prison, sued in his official and individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
