Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Mathew P. W. v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Mathew P. Wilson and Mathew P. W.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wilson v. Petco Health and Wellness Company Inc et al
as 3:2023cv05633
Plaintiff:
Gloria P Wilson
Defendant:
Petco Health and Wellness Company Inc, Petco Animal Supplies Inc and Petco Animal Supplies Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jerome P. Wilson v. Stu Sherman
as 5:2020cv00682
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Petitioner:
Jerome P Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TCJ I, LLC v. Trimed Medical Wholesalers, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04656
Defendant:
Trimed Medical Wholesalers, Inc., Verjine Yesaian, Richard T. Kayseryan and others
Plaintiff:
TCJ I, LLC
Receiver:
Douglas P. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suretec Insurance Company v. Cole-Wilson, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02821
Defendant:
Dan E. Cole, Cole-Wilson, Inc., John P. Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Suretec Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Stephen P. Wilson v. Shawn Hatton
as 2:2016cv07599
Respondent:
Shawn Hatton
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Wilson
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Wilson et al
as 4:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael P. Wilson and Stephanie Viteri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Wilson et al
as 4:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael P. Wilson and Stephanie Viteri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Lozano et al
as 3:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
Ronald P. Wilson
Defendant:
Michael Lozano and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
