Cases 1 - 10 of 231
Su v. LBB Progress Ridge, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
LBB Progress Ridge, LLC, Amergent Hospitality Group Inc., Fred Glick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
Pruitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05221
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Pruitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
(PC) Gray v. Allison, et al
as 1:2023cv01285
Plaintiff:
Otha Gray
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Campbell and J. Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyneman-Pruitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05598
Plaintiff:
Ky'Shawn Hyneman-Pruitt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chet Pruitt v. Manjula Bobbala, et al
as 23-15732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHET RANDALL PRUITT
Defendant / Appellee:
MANJULA BOBBALA, MD, S. GATES, JEFF LYNCH, Warden and others
Houff v. Pruitt
as 3:2023cv00674
Petitioner:
Wayne Thomas Houff
Respondent:
Erika Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pruitt v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
Michael Pruitt
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pruitt v. Weigel
as 2:2022cv02075
Plaintiff:
Charles Pruitt
Defendant:
Natalya Weigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. USA
as 2:2022cv01941
Petitioner:
Brandon Lamar Pruitt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
