Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hammond v. City of Ellensburg et al
as 1:2021cv03008
Defendant:
Terry Weiner, Nancy Goodloe, Chris Herion and others
Plaintiff:
Stacy R Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hammond v. Trump
as 1:2021cv03005
Plaintiff:
Stacy R Hammond
Defendant:
Donald J Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State of Alaska Dept Nat Res, et al v. Agnes Purdy, et al
as 19-35288
Defendant:
DENA' NENA' HENASH, Tanana Chiefs Conference, an Alaska non-profit corporation, FRANCES E. MASSENGALE, DAVID N. DONALD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES and STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Defendant / Appellant:
AGNES M. PURDY, Owner of Native Allotment No. 50-2008-0437 certificate no.; that portion of Native Allotment No. 50-2008-0437 currently occupied by Chicken Ridge Alternate, Myers Fork Spur, Chicken to Franklin and Chicken Ridge Trails, containing 17. and BARBARA A. REDMON, on behalf of Anne L. Purdy, Owner of Native Allotment No. 50-2013-0004, certificate no.; that portion of Native Allotment No. 50-2013-0004 currently occupied by Chicken to Franklin and Chicken Ridge Trails, containing approximately
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Alaska Dept of Natural Resources et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2013cv00008
Plaintiff:
State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources and Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
Defendant:
United States of America , Agnes M. Purdy, Barbara A. Redmon and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
