Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Patterson v. Patterson et al
as 2:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Michael Travis Patterson
Defendant:
Robert B Patterson, RJ Reynolds, Texas Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernston v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv05525
Defendant:
Philip Morris USA Inc, Altria Enterprises LLC, Reynolds American Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bernston
Behrmann v. ABB Inc et al
as 3:2020cv05685
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA Inc, Keenan Properties Inc, Meriden Molded Plastics Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Behrmann H Ronald, Aldrich Pump LLC and Ronald H Behrmann
Not Classified By Court:
Lockheed Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv04880
Defendant:
Janice Hahn, Sheila Kuehl, Hilda L. Solis and others
Plaintiff:
American Snuff Company, RJ Reynolds Tabacco Company, Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Peoria Public Schools District 150 et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv03321
Defendant:
Fontem Ventures B.V., BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO P.L.C., INC., Reynolds American Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MARION COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2, PEORIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT 150, LA MOILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 303 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 2:2019cv01495
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Clark and Yvonne Clark
Defendant:
Liggett Group, LLC, Philip Morris USA, Inc., RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hamid Tabesh v. Philip Morris USA et al
as 5:2009cv00742
Plaintiff:
Hamid Tabesh
Defendant:
Philip Morris USA, Philip Morris USA, RJ Reynolds Tabacco Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
