Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Spiro Kamar, et al v. Radio Shack Corporation
as 13-57157
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SPIRO KAMAR, individual, on behalf of themselves and all other simiarly situated, JAMES MITCHELL, individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similary situated, ARIANN PARTIDA, individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similary situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
ANTONIO BOATNER, Jr.
Defendant:
RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daniel Ordonez v. Radio Shack
as 13-80015
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DANIEL ORDONEZ, individually, and on behalf of all other similarly situated current and former employees of Radio Shack
Defendant - Respondent:
RADIO SHACK, a Delaware corporation
Hakeem et al v. RadioShack Corporation et al
as 2:2012at00598
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hakeem and Mark Williams
Defendant:
RadioShack Corporation , Vanessa Eployee and Jane Doe Radio Shack Store Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hakeem et al v. Radio Shack Store Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01133
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hakeem and Mark Williams
Defendant:
Vanessa - and Radio Shack Store Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Artemis v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00820
Plaintiff:
Thia E Artemis
Defendant:
Sprint Corporation, Radio Shack Corporation, Jose German and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Daniel Ordonez v. Radio Shack et al
as 2:2010cv07060
Defendant:
Does and Radio Shack
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ordonez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
