Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08056
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Estate of Anthony Ray Lopez Sr. et al v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2023cv02304
Plaintiff:
Estate of Anthony Ray Lopez Sr., Estate of Madeline Vasquez, Estate of Josephine Guadalupe Dominguez and others
Defendant:
City of Ontario, San Bernardino County, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adam Lopez v. Samuel Ko, et al
as 22-55174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM RAY LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL KO, Primary Care Physician and MAJA BOYD, Nurse Practitioner
Adam Lopez v. Samuel Ko, et al
as 20-56420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM RAY LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL KO, Primary Care Physician and MAJA BOYD, Nurse Practitioner
Adam Lopez v. Brown, et al
as 20-15262
Defendant / Appellee:
SMITH, ENENMOH, Chief Medical Executive, ROSS, Physician's Assistant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM RAY LOPEZ
Figueroa v. Kern County et al
as 1:2019cv00558
Defendant:
Al Valdez, Kern County, Gregg Bresson and others
Plaintiff:
Vicente Benavides Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Figueroa v. Kern County et al
as 1:2019at00310
Defendant:
Al Valdez, Kern County, Gregg Bresson and others
Plaintiff:
Vicente Benavides Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam Lopez v. P. Santoyo, et al
as 11-55355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM RAY LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
P. SANTOYO, Dentist and C. ROBERTSON, Chief Dental Officer
Ramon Lopez-Vejar v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-73947
Petitioner:
RAMON LOPEZ-VEJAR, AKA Ray Lopez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Lopez v. Giurbino et al
as 3:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Adam Ray Lopez
Defendant:
G Giurbino, P Santoyo, M Levin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
