Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cabrera-Ruelas v. Garland
as 24-156
Petitioner:
REYMUNDO CABRERA-RUELAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ruelas et al v. MGT Trucking LLC et al
as 6:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
Raul Ruelas and Paula Ruelas
Defendant:
MGT Trucking LLc, Gurmit Malli, XYZ Companies or Corporations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ruelas v. V.E.P. Valley Exterior Painting LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01942
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruelas
Defendant:
V.E.P. Valley Exterior Painting LLC, Richard Querry and Erika Querry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalez Ruelas v. Garland
as 23-2256
Petitioner:
ALONSO GONZALEZ RUELAS, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ruelas v. City of Sanger, et al.
as 1:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Salina Ruelas
Defendant:
City of Sanger, Sanger Police Department and J. Deshwan Torrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ruelas v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00491
Petitioner:
Thaddaeus Sanchez Ruelas
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
