Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv01873
Plaintiff:
Timothy Huntley Williams
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Steven P Logan and Suzanne Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rune Kraft v. Valerie Fairbank, et al
as 23-16048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUNE KRAFT
Defendant / Appellee:
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, M MARGARET MCKEOWN, JOHN F WALTER and others
Kraft v. Fairbank et al
as 2:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
Valerie Baker Fairbank, M Margaret McKeown, John F Walter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kraft v. Gainey Ranch Community Association et al
as 2:2022cv02135
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
Gainey Ranch Community Association, Karen Epstein, Jim Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B Garland, Mary Murguia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tsinginie v. Logan
as 2:2020cv01623
Respondent:
Steven P Logan
Petitioner:
Nelrick Lee Tsinginie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Edwards v. Lakewood Community Association et al
as 2:2017cv04661
Plaintiff:
Stephen S Edwards
Defendant:
Lakewood Community Association, Family of Christ Lutheran Church, Maricopa County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis #195873 v. Duca et al
as 2:2016cv04097
Plaintiff:
Philip Davis
Defendant:
Cindy Duca, Steven P Logan and Deborah M Fine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis #195873 v. Logan et al
as 2:2016cv03525
Plaintiff:
Philip Davis
Defendant:
Steven P Logan, Deborah M Fine, Cindy Duca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis #195873 v. Logan
as 2:2016cv03532
Defendant:
Steven P Logan
Plaintiff:
Philip Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
