Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McMackin v. Campbell
as 2:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Pannee Leitch McMackin
Defendant:
Scott Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Leitch v. campbell et al
as 2:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Pannee Leitch McMackin
Defendant:
Scott Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lisa Earl, et al v. Scott Campbell, et al
as 20-35217
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O.B., a minor child, OSCEOLA BLUEHORSE, on behalf of, K.S., a minor child and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TACOMA, SCOTT CAMPBELL, and the marital community of Scott and Jane Doe Campbell, JACK NASWORTHY, the marital community of Nasworthy and Jane Doe Nasworthy and others
Scott Campbell v. Jas Hennessy and Co. et al
as 2:2018cv04600
Defendant:
360 Creative, Does, Hennessy S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Campbell
Conde et al v. City of San Jose
as 5:2018cv01403
Plaintiff:
Marco Conde , Mark Ramirez , Michael Golder and others
Defendant:
City of San Jose
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Earl et al v. Campbell et al
as 3:2017cv05315
Plaintiff:
Lisa Earl , K.S. , K.W. and others
Defendant:
Scott Campbell and City of Tacoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apex Imaging Services Inc v. Joseph Scott Campbell et al
as 2:2012cv09136
Plaintiff:
Apex Imaging Services Inc
Defendant:
Joseph Scott Campbell and Does
Campbell et al v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2011cv05498
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Campbell , Kerie Campbell , Marcus Kryshka and others
Defendant:
City of Oakland and Howard Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckman v. Mission Federal Services, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv02915
Plaintiff:
Mary Buckman
Defendant:
Mission Federal Services, LLC, Mission Federal Credit Union, The Art Collector and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
