Cases 1 - 10 of 244
Hunter v. Paterson, et al.
as 24-1291
Plaintiff:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Defendant:
STATE MEDIA PERPETRATORS, RICK ALFREAD MANDEVILLE, SCOTT JONES and others
Murray v. Parlow et al
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Patricia Parlow, Lane County DAs Office, Erick Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T Knapp, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Erick T. Knapp, Lane Count DAs Office, Kamala H Shugar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Shugan et al
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Kamala H Shugar, Lane County DAs Office, Erick T. Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Scott Jones, Erick T. Knapp, Kamala H Shugar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. McAlpin et al
as 6:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Judge McAlpin, Erik T Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T. Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gateway Chevrolet Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv02323
Plaintiff:
Scott Jones and Scott-Andrew Jones, II
Defendant:
Gateway Chevrolet Incorporated and Robert Revere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Desert Financial Credit Union
as 2:2023cv02322
Plaintiff:
Scott Jones and Scott-Andrew Jones, II
Defendant:
Desert Financial Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
