Cases 1 - 10 of 280
Carrillo v. Siegel Suites Select
as 2:2024cv01239
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Siegel Suites Select
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Warner v. Desouza et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Michael Warner
Defendant:
Francis A. Desouza, Sam A. Samad, Frances Arnold and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Siegel v. PostMeds, Inc.
as 4:2023cv06134
Plaintiff:
Michael Siegel
Defendant:
PostMeds, Inc. d/b/a TruePill and PostMeds, Inc. doing business as TruePill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Brooks et al v. Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Brooks, Laura Siegel, Tiffany Vinson and others
Defendant:
Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Greystar California, Inc., 100 Altair, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
Gallaher v. IOSM, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03625
Plaintiff:
Nichole Gallaher
Defendant:
IOSM, Inc., Zulema Garcia and Virginia Siegel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Siegel v. Novo Nordisk Inc
as 3:2023cv05459
Plaintiff:
Jamie Siegel, United States of America, State of Oklahoma and others
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Siegel v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Margaret K Siegel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
