Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Incito Schools et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Incito Schools, Amanda Jelleson and April Black
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Unknown Brnovich, Steve Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Conso v. City of Eureka et al
as 1:2021cv04480
Defendant:
City of Eureka, William Honsal, Steve Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Molly Crane Conso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler Miller v. Steve Watson
as 20-35922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYLER MILLER, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE WATSON, an individual
United California Glass & Door v. Union Rolling Door Company et al
as 4:2019cv03005
Plaintiff:
United California Glass & Door
Defendant:
Union Rolling Door Company, Steve Watson and Carlo Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Miller v. Watson et al
as 3:2018cv00562
Defendant:
Atkin Blitz, Bullard Law P.C., Jeffrey Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leatherman v. City of Eureka et al
as 4:2017cv05610
Plaintiff:
Oscar Leatherman
Defendant:
Steve Watson, Eureka Police Department and City of Eureka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alan Cooke, et al v. Terry Liles, et al
as 13-15735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN A. COOKE and GAGE T. COOKE
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY LILES, an individual, MURL HARPHAM, an individual, STEVE WATSON, an individual and others
Cooke et al v. Liles et al
as 1:2012cv01844
Plaintiff:
Alan A. Cooke and Gage T. Cooke
Defendant:
Terry Liles, Murl Harpham, Steve Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Liles et al
as 1:2010cv00696
Plaintiff:
Alan Anthony Cooke
Defendant:
Terry Liles, Murl Harpham, Steve Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
