Cases 1 - 10 of 13
James Daniel Alexander v. Jerry Brown et al
as 8:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Alexander
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Kathleen Allison, Jeffrey A Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thompson v. Addison, et al.
as 1:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Thompson
Defendant:
L Addison, T Nelson, J. Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. California Employment Development Department et al
as 3:2021cv02145
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Nelson
Defendant:
California Employment Developement Department and Rita Saenz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 va Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment
Kenley v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2017cv08095
Plaintiff:
Margaret Kenley
Defendant:
Mohave, County of , Mohave County Sheriff's Office and T Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson, et al., v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2016cv02961
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Byron T. Nelson and Michelle A. Udell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cohea v. Melo
as 1:2015cv00353
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
M Melo, Thelton E Henderson, John L. Noonan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohea v. Melo
as 4:2014cv04288
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
M. Melo, Thelton E. Henderson, John L. Noonan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Almy v. Brandon Davis, et al
as 13-17257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANDON DAVIS, Correctional Officer at LCC, J. BUTTON, CSSi (Caseworker) at WSCC, ERIC FANCHER, NDOC Correctional Officer and others
Almy v. Davis et al
as 2:2012cv00129
Plaintiff:
Kevin Almy
Defendant:
J. Button, D. Davis, Fancher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almy v. Davis et al
as 3:2011cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kevin Drew Almy
Defendant:
D. Davis, Holloway, Robert LeGrand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
