Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Saboor v. United States District Court of Arizona
as 2:2019cv04626
Petitioner:
Abdul Saboor and Rah El Ra Bey
Respondent:
United States District Court of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Atwood v. Carls Jr Restaurants et al
as 2:2014cv02748
Plaintiff:
Richard B Atwood
Defendant:
Carls Jr Restaurants, MJKL Enterprises LLC, Minsfion Indu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jimenez v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv02444
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Maricopa County Sheriff's Department, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vianez v. United States District Court of Arizona
as 2:2013cv02310
Plaintiff:
Juan Alexander Vianez
Defendant:
United States District Court of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quintero v. United States District Court of Arizona
as 2:2013cv02198
Plaintiff:
Jaime Quintero
Defendant:
United States District Court of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cortes-Rodriguez v. Hippert et al
as 4:2012cv00898
Plaintiff:
Pedro Cortes-Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas G Hippert, Robert L Murray, United States District Court of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cortes v. United States District Court of Arizona
as 2:2012cv01321
Plaintiff:
Edwin Cortes
Defendant:
United States District Court of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. United States District Court of Arizona et al
as 4:2010cv00596
Plaintiff:
Carla Thomas
Defendant:
United States District Court of Arizona and Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ross v. United States District Court of Arizona
as 2:2007cv00007
Petitioner:
Melvin Gene Ross
Respondent:
United States District Court of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
