Cases 1 - 10 of 41
(PC) Kambon v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv01765
Plaintiff:
Theon Kambon
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Jim Cooper, Venessa Vaden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mathews v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv01021
Plaintiff:
James Lee Mathews
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Jim Cooper, Yee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaden v. Social Security
as 3:2022cv00504
Plaintiff:
Judy Elizabeth Vaden
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(PC) Vaden v. Heu et al
as 2:2021cv01066
Defendant:
L. Morris, E. De La Cruz, Kahlon and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Vaden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Gogol v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2020cv01397
Defendant:
R. Cavazos, J. Attschuler, M. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Gogol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Stephen v. Tileston et al
as 2:2020cv01841
Defendant:
N. Davis, N. Pike, M. Ormand and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Foulger, Holly Garner, Nichole Lynott and others
Defendant:
Darwin Widjaja, Matthew Ehrlichman, Brenton Marrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
