Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Michael W. Mitchell, Jr. v. Warden J. Gasetllo
as 5:2020cv00370
Respondent:
Warden J. Gasetllo
Petitioner:
Micahel W. Mitchell, Jr. and Michael W. Mitchell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Mitchell v. CSP Corcoran, et al
as 16-17057
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES R. W. MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee:
CSP CORCORAN and DAVEY
Godwin v. Shartle et al
as 4:2016cv00455
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant:
JT Shartle, A Cristinzio, Unknown Van Deuender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cox Communications Arizona LLC v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2015cv01829
Plaintiff:
Cox Communications Arizona LLC
Defendant:
Tempe, City of and Mark W Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kherdeen v. CCA et al
as 3:2014cv02696
Plaintiff:
Mazen J. Kherdeen and Jim Freeman
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), CCA, Clueless Corporation of America (CCA) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr Petition for Removal
Barker et al v. Credit Suisse AG et al
as 1:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Charles Barker, Susan L. Barker, Lawrence Burgee and others
Defendant:
Credit Suisse AG, Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gerald W Mitchell v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 5:2013cv01831
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Gerald W Mitchell
Gerald W Mitchell v. Carolyn W Colvin
as 2:2013cv07454
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Gerald W Mitchell
Mitchell v. Genuine Parts Company et al
as 2:2013cv00346
Defendant:
Balkamp, Inc., Dorman Products, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gutenkauf v. Tempe, City of et al
as 2:2010cv02129
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arthur Gutenkauf
Defendant:
Tempe, City of, Hugh Hallman, Unknown Hallman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
