Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Hooper v. County of San Diego, et al.
as 24-2709
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HOOPER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM B. KOLENDER, Sheriff, in his official and individual capacities and others
Ader v. NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01759
Plaintiff:
Ali Ader
Defendant:
NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., William J. Rieflin, David V. Goeddel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Goodrum v. Hooper
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrun and Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
Stanley Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hooper v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Marjorie L. Hooper
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Seidenstricker et al v. Daimler Truck North America LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Maria Seidenstricker, Elliot Vanderslice, Michael Franco and others
Defendant:
Daimler Truck North America LLC, Daimler North America Corporation, Daimler Truck Holding AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Curry v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2023cv01535
Plaintiff:
Melvin Justin Curry
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Andrew Denton, Brian Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
