Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Kruse Technology Partnership v. General Motors Company
as 2:2009cv04970
Plaintiff:
Kruse Technology Partnership, Kruse Technology Partnership, Kruse Technology Partnership and others
Defendant:
General Motors Company, General Motors Company, General Motors Company and others
Counter Claimant:
General Motors Company, General Motors Company, General Motors Company and others
Counter Defendant:
Kruse Technology Partnership, Kruse Technology Partnership, Kruse Technology Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Type:
Intellectual Property
Coupled Products L L C v. Nobel Automotive Mexico L L C
as 5:2009cv00323
Plaintiff:
Coupled Products L L C
Defendant:
Nobel Automotive Mexico L L C, Mando America Corp and General Motors Corp
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wacoh Company v. Chrysler LLC et al
as 2:2009cv10119
Plaintiff:
Wacoh Company, Wacoh Company, Wacoh Company and others
Defendant:
Chrysler LLC, Chrysler LLC, Chrysler LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Wacoh Company, Wacoh Company, Wacoh Company and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Wacoh Company v. Chrysler LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00691
Plaintiff:
Wacoh Company, Wacoh Company, Wacoh Company and others
Defendant:
Chrysler LLC, Chrysler LLC, Chrysler LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MHL TEK, LLC v. General Motors Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
MHL TEK, LLC
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation, Saturn Corporation, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pisani v. Van Iderstine et al
as 1:2007cv00187
Plaintiff:
Carol Pisani
Defendant:
Richard L. Van Iderstine, General Motors Corporation, Donnelly Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
