Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Defendant:
Mary B. Windom, Kelli Wise, Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucious v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Kendarius Devan Lucious
Defendant:
Karen Carter, Larry McCovery, Officer Thoggard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Gordy et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Larry McCovery and Bryan Gavins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. McCovery et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Larry McCovery, Christopher Gordy and Bryan Gavins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. McCoy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00354
Defendant:
Maryln Hursley, Kenneth Brooks, Darius Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCaa v. Antonelli (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
Cedriquez McCaa and Cedriquez McCall
Defendant:
United States of America and Bryan Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
