Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 300
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00356
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Le v. Mims et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00332
Plaintiff: David Anthony Le
Defendant: Beth Mims, City of Jemison and Rickey Patrick Self
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff: David P. Wilson
Defendant: John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00564
Plaintiff: Dewayne Cunningham and Dewayne Scott Cunningham
Defendant: John Q. Hamm, David Lamar, Lt. Randolph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00562
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Laman
as 2:2023cv00473
Plaintiff: Derrick Antavis Oliver
Defendant: David Laman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Laman
as 3:2023cv00473
Plaintiff: Derrick Antavis Oliver
Defendant: David Laman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?