Cases 11 - 20 of 119
Petty v. Russell County et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00522
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Russell County, Sergeant Hood, Corp. Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Roderick Wright
Defendant:
Tracy Jackson, Warden Estes, Deputy Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00144
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Deidra Wright, T. Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Cargill and Quincetta Y. Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00991
Defendant:
Deidra Wright, Alabama Department of Corrections, Wendy Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Logan et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2020cv00878
Defendant:
Officer Messer, Officer Osburn, Officer Logan and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Nurses Staff of Covington County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00834
Defendant:
Betty Long, Thomas Huggins, Nurses Staff of Covington County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Edward Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CM Vantage Specialty Insurance Company v. Mayflower Investments, LLC, et al
as 2:2020cv00614
Defendant:
Mayflower Investments, LLC, Vakita Ragland, Demecia Wright and others
Plaintiff:
CM Vantage Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Wright v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00516
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Whatley v. Wright et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00318
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Deidra Wright and Elmore County
Plaintiff:
Susan Z. Whatley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. Kendrick (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00263
Defendant:
Robbie Wright Kendrick
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
