Cases 11 - 20 of 146
Davis v. Elmore County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Tonya Lynn Davis
Defendant:
Bill Franklin, Elmore County Jail, Mark K. McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Benny et al (MAG +)
as 1:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Ternecia D. Wilson
Defendant:
Benny Boom, Rose Gordon, Franklin R. Ruiz, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Elmore County Jail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00819
Plaintiff:
Larry H. Mitchell
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail, Sgt. Heard, Bill Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bolton v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00721
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bolton and Timothy Franklin Bolton
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Hugh Hood, Michael Borwicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pears v. Franklin
as 2:2021cv00668
Plaintiff:
Andrew H. Pears
Defendant:
Bill Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Quality Correctional Health Care et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00616
Plaintiff:
David Mims
Defendant:
James Glenn Goggans, Tracy Jackson, Captain Tuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv00349
Defendant:
Belinda Robinson and City of Dothan, Alabama
Plaintiff:
Tydarrius Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Butler et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00315
Defendant:
Louis Vinson Franklin, Sr., R. Hightower, Tom T. Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Ranger Pickett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Dothan City Schools et al
as 1:2021cv00248
Defendant:
Franklin Jones, Brenda Guilford, Chris Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.