Cases 31 - 40 of 1,141
Holmes v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
William Marc Holmes
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Williams v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
as 1:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Terria Denise Williams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bush et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Adam Bush, Delsea Creel, L. C. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy Buckner, Dan Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryles v. Logan et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Heath Taylor, William Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Laster et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Captain Laster, Lt. Langley, Sgt. Casino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Ventress Correctional Facility, Karen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Williams v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keith v. City Dothan Municipality et al (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Sonja Floyd Keith
Defendant:
City Dothan Municipality, City of Dothan, Alabama, Mark Saliba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
