Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Rivers v. Giles et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00354
Plaintiff: Frederick Rivers
Defendant: J. C. Giles, Darrell Parker, M. L. Monk and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rivers v. Bedsole et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00024
Plaintiff: Frederick Rivers
Defendant: Connie Bedsole, Ernie Mashburn, J. C. Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zorn et al v. Integon Insurance Company et al MAG+
as 1:2007cv01048
Defendant: Robert Ignasiak, Integon Insurance Company, Scott. M.W. Haufe and others
Plaintiff: Roger Zorn and Vonnie Zorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Fourth Quarter, Inc. et al Featured Case
as 3:2007cv00921
Plaintiff: Broadcast Music, Inc., Broadcast Music, Inc., Fantasy, Inc. and others
Defendant: Fourth Quarter, Inc., Patrick J. Grider and Daniel Grider
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Rivers v. Culliver et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2007cv00894
Plaintiff: Wallace Rivers
Defendant: Grantt Culliver and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00540
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00395
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Rivers v. Arvinmeritor Sejong, LLC.
as 2:2007cv00104
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Rivers and Nathaniel Rivers
Defendant: Arvinmeritor Sejong, LLC. and Arvinmeritor Sejong, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?