Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Cash v. Myers et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Cash
Defendant:
Theodore Myers, III and Myers Unlimited, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riedler v. Triple V, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Susan Riedler
Defendant:
Triple V, Inc. doing business as Cash Saver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Whitlow v. Fowler et al
as 2:2021cv00632
Plaintiff:
David Whitlow
Defendant:
Kendra Fowler, Customers Bank doing business as BankMobile, Square, Inc. of Californa doing business as Cash App and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McClendon v. Cash et al (INMATE 1) (LEAD)
as 2:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Willie Denoris McClendon
Defendant:
K. Cash
Consolidated Defendant:
Otis Smith, William A. Tate and M. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hunter v. Cash Saver Groceries
as 2:2015cv00632
Plaintiff:
Jerry Virgil Hunter
Defendant:
Cash Saver Groceries and Big Daddy Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Cash et al
as 1:2013mc03652
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Peter L. Cash
Garnishee:
Henderson Banc Shares
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Broadcast Music, Inc., et al v. Firenze, II, LLC, et al
as 2:2013cv00220
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Sony/ATV Songs LLC , House of Cash, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Firenze, II, LLC and Yance E. MacLeroy
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bagley v. Cash (CONSENT)
as 1:2012cv00620
Plaintiff:
James W. Bagley
Defendant:
Peter L. Cash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. Maddox et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00702
Plaintiff:
Rupert Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
Will Maddox, Troy Silva, Don Linsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
