Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Canidate v. Walmart, Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Monique Roshaun Canidate and Monique R. Canidate
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart Store No. 930 and Christopher Hollands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Morgan v. Holland (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Mrs. Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. City of Brundidge et al
as 2:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Moses Davenport
Defendant:
City of Brundidge, Isabelle Boyd, Willie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holland v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00648
Plaintiff:
James Edward Holland
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey and Reosha Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant:
Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00787
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Holland and Michael Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miles v. Davis et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00909
Defendant:
Rachel Lewis, Corporal Brown, Lt. Holland and others
Plaintiff:
Aljawon Dawyane Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Drake et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00680
Defendant:
Elizabeth Laseter, Officer Holland, Kenneth Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Elzie Stephen Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Spradlin et al
as 3:2018cv00671
Defendant:
Sherry Spradlin Gillis and Gary Spradlin
Plaintiff:
Deborah Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
