Cases 1 - 10 of 270
Hill v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Heath Taylor and Steve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ivey et al
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Hal Taylor, Laura Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Elmore Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Chris Dwayne Williams
Defendant:
Elmore Correctional Facility, Lt. Carter, Ms. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Posey et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Seron K. Smith
Defendant:
Captain Posey, Captain Nolan, Lt. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enchanted Green LLC v. Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission et al
as 2:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Enchanted Green LLC
Defendant:
Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission, William Saliski, Jr., Sam Blakemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryles v. Logan et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Heath Taylor, William Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
