Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adam Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Heath Taylor and Steve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adams Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard v. Max Credit Union et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Richard
Defendant:
Max Credit Union, Martin Head, Chambless Math and Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Adrienne Givens, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Donald Hill
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. TK Elevator Corporation
as 2:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Janice Hill
Defendant:
TK Elevator Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
