Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Oliver v. Ward et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Cam Ward, Leigh Gwanthney, Darryl Littleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Mackey et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Cherryl Oliver
Defendant:
Eric Mackey and James Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duffy et al v. United States Attorney General
as 1:2023cv00677
Plaintiff:
Matilda Duffy and Jack Ward renfro
Defendant:
United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Buckner et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner, Allison Bryars, Stephanie Glispee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Eddie O'Neal Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Captain Fail, Captain Nolen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Russell County Department of Human Resources et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Megan Dawson and Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Russell County Department of Human Resources, Alabama Attorney General Office, Greg Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
