Cases 81 - 90 of 389
Robinson v. Dunn et al
as 7:2020cv00762
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Robinson
Defendant:
COI Overstreet, Jefferson Dunn and Alabama Institution Finance Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stackhouse v. Robinson et al
as 5:2020cv00599
Defendant:
Johnothan Lovett, Denise McKenzie, Coady and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Adam Stackhouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00289
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Robinson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv00419
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
RT Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brunson, Robinson & Huffstutler Attorneys, P.A. et al v. CNA Insurance Companies et al
as 4:2020cv00182
Defendant:
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford and CNA Insurance Companies
Plaintiff:
Brunson, Robinson & Huffstutler Attorneys, P.A., Steve Brunson and Brunson, McGill & Robinson Attorneys, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Differ v. Diveley et al
as 2:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Ms Kathleen R Dively, Ms Michelle Robinson and Kathleen R Diveley
Plaintiff:
Dennis John Differ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Robinson et al
as 1:2019cv02090
Defendant:
Scott Praider, Gabriel Brooks, Rashaun Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Demetrius Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robinson v. Apotex Corp et al
as 2:2019cv02047
Defendant:
Apotex Inc, Apotex Corp and Walmart Inc
Plaintiff:
Cazondra Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
