Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Sliffe v. Boyd et al
as 4:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Sliffe
Defendant:
John T Boyd, Uniece Jackson, Kanisha Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2012cv00793
Plaintiff:
Curtis Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Agriculture, Gary Cochran, Hendra Woodfork and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ashley v. Doe et al
as 4:2012cv00733
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley
Defendant:
Jane Doe and Mike Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Marshall v. Drew Central School District et al
as 5:2012cv00428
Plaintiff:
Brian Marshall
Defendant:
Drew Central School District, Rene Nowles, Mike Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Smith v. St Vincent Infirmary et al
as 4:2011cv00743
Plaintiff:
Nicie Smith
Defendant:
St Vincent Infirmary, Elizabeth Wise, Donna Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Crittenden County Public Defender et al
as 3:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Jones
Defendant:
Crittenden County Public Defender, Thomas Montgomery, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Gay et al
as 2:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Andrew T Gay and Marianna Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Kurt Knickrehm, John Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crift v. Williams et al
as 5:2009cv00326
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Crift, Jr and Lawrence Crift, Jr
Defendant:
Jason Williams, Joey Moore, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Doe et al v. Selig et al
as 4:2008cv00622
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
John Selig, Pat Page and Alicen Bennett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
