Cases 11 - 20 of 182
Carter v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Toby E Carter
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Justin A W Johnson
Defendant:
BJ Carter, Regina Hindman, James Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Bryan Williams
Defendant:
BJ Carter, Regina Hindman, James Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Karen Morris
Defendant:
Shanna Carter, Regina Hindyman, Murray Lee Stotts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunkin v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Misty Dunkin
Defendant:
Karen Morris, Shanna Carter, Regina Hindyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Poinsett County Detention Center
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Henry Diaz
Defendant:
Poinsett County Detention Center, B J Carter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Does
as 3:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Rubby James Gray
Defendant:
Does, BJ Carter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friend v. Duncan et al
as 4:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Earnest Edward Friend
Defendant:
Gina Duncan, Sheila Robertson, Brianna Thomson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Synder et al
as 3:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
James D Ward
Defendant:
Brad Synder, J Carter and Turn Key Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. North Little Rock Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Cody S Howard
Defendant:
North Little Rock Police Department, C Carter and Does 1-2, Detectives, NLRPD, Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
