Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Williams v. Sanders et al
as 4:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Shawn Williams
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Tim Griffin, Joe Profiri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00712
Defendant:
Meta, USA, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties and others
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Pierce
as 4:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Robert S Rutherford
Defendant:
Annette Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Brad Paul Smith
Defendant:
Latoya A Johnson, Amber L Coleman, Gary Musselwhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Coleman et al
as 4:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Judd Walker
Defendant:
Jared Coleman, Tyler Pierce, Tom Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Brown v. Arivette et al
as 4:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Brion DayShawn Brown
Defendant:
Eddie Arivette, Darryl Pierce, Scott Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedraza v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pedraza
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, G Musselwhite, Rob Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swindle v. Bunch et al
as 3:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Sharon Swindle
Defendant:
Evan Bunch and Chris Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henyard v. Bunch et al
as 3:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Paul Henyard, Jr
Defendant:
Evan Bunch and Chris Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Radford
Defendant:
Kiamera M King, Ballon, Quanica Bealer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
