Cases 11 - 20 of 200
Williams v. Bell
as 4:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Roger Williams
Defendant:
Debra Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Brad Paul Smith
Defendant:
Felecia M Bell, Talley, Jaramillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollinger v. Aramark Facility Services LLC
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Sheila Bell Hollinger
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lane v. Gardner et al
as 3:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Richard Lane
Defendant:
Kristy Gardner, BJ Carter and Jack Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Alan Kent Sharp
Defendant:
Kevin Bell, Timothy Macomas and Melissa Sisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrelson v. Saline County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Larry Harrelson
Defendant:
Saline County Jail, Saline County Sheriff's Office, James Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutter & Gillham PLLC et al v. Henry et al
as 4:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Sutter & Gillham PLLC, Luther Sutter and Lucian Gillham
Defendant:
Judy Simmons Henry, Jacob Fair, Scott Irby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Grooms v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael James Grooms
Defendant:
Kevin Bell, Melissa Sisco and Does Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Straughn et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
William F Straughn, Maurice Culclager, C Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
