Cases 11 - 20 of 655
Gamble v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coy Gamble
Defendant:
Phillip Miller, Clayton Edwards and Heather Meadows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Israel v. Fenner et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
CessanadaKha Jahish Israel
Defendant:
Duane Edward Fenner, Holmes, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Meadows et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Walker
Defendant:
Heather Meadows, Christopher Dunn, Phillip E Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nacho Daddy LLC v. Edwards
as 4:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Nacho Daddy LLC
Defendant:
Chris Edwards doing business as Nacho Daddy's BBQ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hall v. Carthers
as 4:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Hall
Defendant:
Kelly Carthers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Allen v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections and Well Path
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Edward White
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Community Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Community Corrections, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Budnik et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, William Freeman, Thomas Rolland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
