Cases 11 - 20 of 217
Holt v. McCracdie et al
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Holt
Defendant:
Tyran McCracdie, Gryland Sander, Willie Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2022cv01269
Plaintiff:
Gregory Green
Defendant:
Jerry Bradshaw, Jared Self, Amber N Corlis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holt v. Graves et al
as 4:2022cv01132
Plaintiff:
Gregory Holt and Abdul Maalik Muhammad
Defendant:
Solomon Graves and Jared Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shell v. Lingo et al
as 4:2022cv01121
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Shell
Defendant:
Josh Lingo, Lloyd Elkins, Gregory Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Hogg et al
as 4:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Perry
Defendant:
Leonard Hogg, Amanda Rodgers, Chris Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinder v. WellPath LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00138
Defendant:
WellPath LLC, Correct Care Solutions LLC, Gregory Reichgl and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Pinder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kusper v. Drale et al
as 4:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kusper
Defendant:
Christina Drale, Gregory Guisbiers, Brian Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Holt v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00553
Plaintiff:
Gregory Holt and Abdul Maalik Muhammad
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and William Straughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holt v. Department of Justice
as 4:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Gregory Holt and Abdul Maalik Muhammad
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Coleman
Defendant:
Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
