Cases 61 - 70 of 513
Clendenig v. Does
as 4:2022cv01010
Plaintiff:
Joe Clendenig
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Joe D Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Arkansas Department of Human Services, UAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Defendant:
McGregor, Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Grissom v. Freyder et al
as 4:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Wesley E Grissom
Defendant:
Charlie Freyder, Joe Page and Dale Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Hogg et al
as 4:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Perry
Defendant:
Leonard Hogg, Amanda Rodgers, Chris Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Spotify
as 4:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
Joe Willis Young
Defendant:
Spotify
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Kirkpatrick et al v. Acosta et al
as 4:2022cv00672
Plaintiff:
Joe Kirkpatrick and Sharon Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
Tiberio Acosta and Four Carriers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Joe Ernest Phillips
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cook v. Daniels et al
as 4:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Joe H Cook, III
Defendant:
C Daniels and F Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
