Cases 1 - 10 of 1,092
Jackson v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00787
Defendant:
Joe E Griffin, Wren Autrey, Brent Haltom and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00769
Defendant:
Jason Jones and Rena Jones
Plaintiff:
Larry Wade Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2024cv00704
Defendant:
Ivo Jones, Larry Rodgers, Charles Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Dwight Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Langguth v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00683
Defendant:
Allen Jones and Cathleen Compton
Plaintiff:
Gerhard Langguth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Walker et al
as 4:2024cv00649
Defendant:
Aubrey K Walker, D Ballard and Rice
Plaintiff:
Lynn D Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Blytheville School District Board of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Jones and Leon Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Blytheville School District Board of Education and Desmond Hammett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 4:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Larry Edmond Williams
Defendant:
Chris Wieland, Kimberly Dunn, Karvarious Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. McCradic et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jay Jones
Defendant:
Elkins, Tyran McCradic and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Yiely et al
as 4:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Jones
Defendant:
Lee, Poole, Yiely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Defendant:
Latonya Honorable and Arkansas Insurance Department
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
