Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Travis v. USA et al
as 2:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Robby Travis
Defendant:
USA, Charles Samuels, Harell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Samuels et al
as 4:2013cv00482
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00412
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Charles Samuels, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Thompson et al
as 4:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Thompson, Price, Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Haynes et al
as 2:2013cv00082
Defendant:
United States Congress, Malissa Jackson, United States Senate and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Does, et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Roberts et al
as 2:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
W Roberts, Truck, Vlad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Halke et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. FCC Forrest City et al
as 2:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI - Forrest City, Arkansas Education Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 2:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
