Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Cates v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Marty Cates
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Cates v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Cates
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Hutchinson v. Shorter College et al
as 4:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hutchinson
Defendant:
Shorter College, Edwin Wosby, B Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cates v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Danny William Cates
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Cox et al
as 3:2020cv00070
Plaintiff:
Eric D Williams
Defendant:
D Crittenden, Barnum, Brent Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Franks et al
as 3:2020cv00043
Plaintiff:
Eric D Williams
Defendant:
T Huggins, D Crittenden, Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Baptist Health et al
as 4:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Victor Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Baptist Health, Douglas Weeks, Everett Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bell et al v. Desoto Gathering Company LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00628
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bell , Robert Adolph , AK Byers Family Property LLC and others
Defendant:
Desoto Gathering Company LLC , SWN Production LLC , SWN Energy Services Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Yang v. Little Rock, City of et al
as 4:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
Dayong Yang
Defendant:
Little Rock, City of , Stuart Thomas , Wayne Bewley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Cates v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E Cates
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
