Cases 31 - 40 of 140
McCotry v. Holloway et al
as 5:2022cv05145
Plaintiff:
Pete McCotry, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Shawn Holloway and District Judge Chris M. Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dennis
as 5:2022cv05135
Plaintiff:
James Elwood Smith
Defendant:
Judge Jodi Raines Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Ohms et al
as 6:2022cv06076
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Stinson
Defendant:
Judge Ralph Ohms, Michelle Lawrence, Timothy Beckham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Phaypanya et al
as 5:2022cv05130
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Morgan
Defendant:
Pihara Yosita, Clint Doe, Nick Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stutesman v. Karas Health et al
as 5:2022cv05124
Plaintiff:
Harry C. Stutesman
Defendant:
Det. Cody Strange, Det. Levine Garrett, Det. Tommy Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgon v. Vosito et al
as 5:2022cv05123
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Morgon
Defendant:
P. Vosito, Clint, Nick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farella v. Benton County District Court, DIV.4
as 5:2022cv05121
Plaintiff:
Abigail Farella and Logan W. Murphy
Defendant:
Benton County District Court, DIV. 4 and District Judge A.J. Anglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. President & CEO of Walmart Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv05116
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anderson
Defendant:
President & CEO of Walmart Inc., WalMart, Inc., Sally Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harvey v. Hearnsberger
as 6:2022cv06066
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen Harvey
Defendant:
Circuit Judge Marcia Hearnsberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivory v. State of Arkansas et al
as 6:2022cv06055
Plaintiff:
Kenney Lee Ivory
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, Circuit Judge Cindy Thyer and Lilly Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
