Cases 61 - 70 of 191
Gardner v. Emsweller et al
as 6:2020cv06007
Defendant:
Lieutenant Jackson, A. Ruh, Sergeant Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
Javon Henry Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Watson et al
as 6:2019cv06144
Defendant:
Dunkin, Lt. Jackson and Katline Watson
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Farmer, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Kelly et al
as 6:2019cv06108
Defendant:
Jane Doe/Nurse Amanda, Mr. Jackson, Wendy Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Alex Jerome Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Clark et al
as 6:2019cv06106
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Warden Faust, Investigator Thomas Rowland and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel B. Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wernette et al v. Gaynor et al
as 6:2019cv06097
Plaintiff:
Teresa Wernette and Phillip Wernette
Defendant:
Pete T Gaynor, Alex Strawn Insurance Agency, Inc., State Farm Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Jackson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2019cv02108
Plaintiff:
Micheal Ray Jackson, Sr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson et al v. UMB Bank National Association et al
as 5:2019cv05153
Plaintiff:
Gail L. Jackson and Kevin M. Jackson
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings, LLC, Rushmore Loan Management Services and UMB Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bailey v. Clark et al
as 6:2019cv06095
Defendant:
Adam K Clark, Dexter Jackson, Evelyn Haynie and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D Bailey, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Jackson et al
as 3:2019cv03062
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Carroll County and Circuit Judge Charles Scott Jackson
Plaintiff:
Beverley West
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Jackson v. 3M Company
as 4:2019cv04079
Plaintiff:
Justin Jackson
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
