Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Evans v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2023cv04043
Plaintiff:
Daryl Evans
Defendant:
Debroha Ann Armstrong and Warbritten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2023cv04045
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
Debroha Ann Armstrong and Warbritten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Hodges et al
as 4:2023cv04044
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
T Hodges, Deputy Warden J. Miners, Former Officer Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Miners et al
as 4:2023cv04041
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
Deputy Warden J. Miners and Deborah Ann Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04088
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Armstrong
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Sky Rise Real Estate Fund LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02063
Defendant:
Natasha R. Graf, Steve Hotz, Matthew W. Lindsey and others
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Gill v. Monroe et al
as 6:2020cv06054
Defendant:
Kenneth Gerald Frey, Sr., Nurse Scalles, Kennth Randall Frey and others
Plaintiff:
Johnse Desmon Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Grimes Unit et al
as 6:2020cv06047
Defendant:
Ouachita River Correctional Unit, Grimes Unit, Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Johnse Desmon Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Osborne et al
as 5:2019cv05164
Defendant:
Medical Staff of Grimes Unit, J.C. Cranford, Sisson Construction Company and others
Plaintiff:
Johnse D. Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Huff et al
as 6:2018cv06017
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bryce Hurlbut
Defendant:
Huff, Jane Doe, Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
