Cases 1 - 10 of 342
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Collins v. City of Lowell, Arkansas
as 5:2024cv05122
Plaintiff:
Christopher Collins
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Vicentic v. City of Hot Springs
as 6:2024cv06042
Plaintiff:
Dragan Vicentic
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
City of Gassville, Arkansas v. Midwest Hydro Drilling & Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03015
Plaintiff:
City of Gassville, Arkansas
Defendant:
Midwest Hydro Drilling & Service, Inc. and Granite Re, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Neice v. City of Van Buren, Arkansas
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Richard William Neice
Defendant:
City of Van Buren, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michalek v. Rockport, City of et al
as 6:2024cv06053
Plaintiff:
Brian Judah Beischl Michalek
Defendant:
Rockport, City of and Malvern Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Husbands v. Rowland et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Husbands
Defendant:
Shelly Rowland, Sabrina Williams, Scott Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Finley v. Citi Tele Com
as 6:2024cv06022
Plaintiff:
Jamie Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
Citi Tele Com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarthy v. Calvary Boys Ranch et al
as 5:2024cv05010
Plaintiff:
Alec McCarthy
Defendant:
Calvary Boys Ranch, Calvary Baptist Ministries, Calvary Christian Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
