Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(PC) Metcalf v. Aguazo et al
as 1:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Denzell Metcalf
Defendant:
Jose Aguazo, Albert Gibbons, Tai Ban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Stanfield v. CA Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 1:2020cv01145
Plaintiff:
Micah C. Stanfield
Defendant:
Tai and CA Correctional Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demarest v. The City of Vallejo California et al
as 2:2016cv02271
Plaintiff:
David P. Demarest
Defendant:
The City of Vallejo California, Jodi Brown, Jeff Tai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Caviness et al
as 1:2015cv01085
Plaintiff:
Tai Edmund Fred Abreu
Defendant:
Caviness, Miguel, K. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANT Properties, Inc. v. Wang, et al.
as 2:2013cv00664
Plaintiff:
ANT Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Tai S. Wang and Isabelle W. Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Nichols et al v. City of Vallejo, CA et al
as 2:2012cv02564
Defendant:
City of Vallejo, Joseph Kreins, Joseph and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Nichols and Sara Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichols et al v. City of Vallejo, CA et al
as 2:2012at01363
Defendant:
City of Vallejo, CA, JOSEPH KREINS, fnu OFFICER CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Nichols and SARA FOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
