Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Kelly v. Aramark Services Inc
as 3:2022mc80057
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Kelly and Lawrence Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Services Inc
Billups-Larkin v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2021cv06852
Plaintiff:
Tiara Billups-Larkin
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03530
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Delacruz v. Alameda County et al
as 3:2020cv04016
Defendant:
Lt. Carrie Carone, Deputy A. Procopio, Alameda County and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Louis Delacruz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv03633
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunbar v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2019cv07703
Defendant:
Deputy Smith, Sergeant J. Calegari, Deputy Sheriff at Santa Rita County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lamar Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruelas et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2019cv07637
Plaintiff:
LUIS NUNEZ-ROMERO, DE'ANDRE EUGENE COX, Armida Ruelas and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, SHERIFF Gregory J. Ahern and ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez et al v. Ahern et al
as 3:2019cv07423
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gonzalez, Sergio Morales-Servin, Martin Lawrence Gallardo and others
Defendant:
Derrick C. Hesselein, Gregory J. Ahern, Thomas F. Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lutzo v. Aramark
as 3:2019cv07214
Defendant:
Wellpath, Alameda County and Aramark
Plaintiff:
Zachary Thomas Lutzo, Carl Arthur Renowitzky and Carl A.R. Hitler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deluna v. Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
as 5:2019cv02514
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, LLC
Plaintiff:
Raul Deluna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
