Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Seitz v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al
as 3:2021cv05346
Plaintiff:
James E Seitz and James Edward Seitz
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Teamsters Local 986, Chris Griswold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seitz v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al
as 4:2020cv05442
Plaintiff:
James E Seitz and James Edward Seitz
Defendant:
Chris Griswold, Teamsters Local 986 and International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Goldfinger et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04043
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alston, Noe Farias, Jr., Katherine Coleman and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calkins et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv01884
Plaintiff:
Brian F. McMorris, Felix Jones, Nena Walby and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilmington Trust, NA et al v. James Edward McCreary, et al.
as 4:2020cv00600
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust, NA
Defendant:
James Edward McCreary and Cheryl McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Potts v. Soleimani et al
as 4:2019cv06645
Defendant:
A. Youssef and Dr, M. Soleimani
Plaintiff:
James Edward Potts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilmington Trust v. McCreary et al
as 4:2019cv06387
Defendant:
Cheryl McCreary and James Edward McCreary
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust
Wilmington Trust, NA v. McCreary et al
as 4:2019cv03007
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Trust, NA and Wilmington Trust
Defendant:
Cheryl McCreary and James Edward McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
